Good day, brothers and sisters.The following link will give you the reason why this offer should be turned down...http://www.opseu.org/ops/barg2008/tabletalk/table-talk-update-corrections-jan6-2009.htmIt only takes a few minutes to read, and it will be the most important choice you make, so be informed!Don't be fooled by a plea to settle to avoid a strike. We are not in a strike position and the teams are not negotiating to get a strike.A "NO" VOTE MEANS WE WANT TO NEGOTIATE!!!
WE WANT OUR ISSUES RESOLVED TOO!!!NO DOESN'T MEAN WE ARE GOING TO STRIKE!!!NO MEANS WE ARE READY TO FIGHT!!!Remember that all the things you think are good in this offer are paid for by selling out our part in the short term sickness plan that nurses, maintenance and office staff will still have. In as blunt a manner as I can put it, the offer means take a long term hit for little gained!!!Why?- Casual hours will be reduced if staff don't use sick time they need,
- You will pay premiums for a benefit you won't want to use,
- You might not get paid if you do get sick, and,
- If the employer drags their heels in processing their part of a sick time claim you might not get paid for months.
As for the casual rollover language, why limit it to 250 when we can justify more than that. We've rolled over more than that in the last few years. We need to fight for job security so that all of our officers are full time, just like the police. I don't want a discount store version anymore!When you vote...JUST SAY NO!!!In solidarity, Emidio.